Category Archives: Reviews

’28 Days Later’ Still Outpaces Your Fear


They woke up the zombie genre by reminding us it was never about the zombies.

Zola Predosa Before The Walking Dead turned shambling corpses into television wallpaper and before every horror franchise tacked on a pandemic subplot, 28 Days Later (2002) reanimated a genre that had lost its teeth.

Directed by Danny Boyle and written by Alex Garland, the film didn’t just update horror—it infected it. And what emerged wasn’t a zombie movie, not exactly. It was an existential gut punch delivered at a dead sprint.

That sprint is key. The most terrifying twist in an overused genre wasn’t the virus or the collapse of society—it was the speed. The infected in 28 Days Later don’t stagger or stumble. They sprint, full-bore, screaming with blind rage. It’s not death that’s chasing you anymore. It’s fury. Fear. A tidal wave of emotion with no brakes.

Boyle’s decision to make the monsters fast rewrote the rules of engagement. You couldn’t outmaneuver them, or hide and wait them out. You had to be faster. Or you were dead.

It begins with a whisper. Jim (Cillian Murphy) wakes up alone in a London hospital, a coma survivor stepping into a dead city. The streets are emptied of people but not of tension. There’s no exposition dump, no apocalyptic voiceover. Just eerie stillness and a growing sense of something horribly wrong. It’s in that quiet—vacant bridges, overturned buses, handwritten pleas on walls—that the horror takes hold.

Then the rage comes.

When Jim meets Selena (a fierce, unflinching Naomie Harris), she delivers the film’s thesis as cold truth: “You do what you have to do.” Survival, in this world, is about subtraction—stripping away empathy, hesitation, even humanity. But 28 Days Later never revels in the nihilism. Instead, it threads hope through horror, watching Jim rediscover not just who he is, but who he’s willing to become.

The film’s second act—set in a military safe house—turns the lens from the infected to the truly dangerous: organized men with unchecked power. The soldiers who promise sanctuary are infected too—by entitlement, by control, by a vision of society that bends others to their will. Boyle makes clear that the virus didn’t change everything. It just gave people permission to become who they always were.

Shot on digital video with a guerrilla spirit, the film looks raw, immediate, and unfiltered. London becomes a ghost town at dawn, captured in haunting wide shots that still feel shocking today. There are no special effects in these scenes, just careful timing and empty streets, and they work better than CGI ever could.

And over it all looms John Murphy’s now-iconic score, especially “In the House – In a Heartbeat,” a slow build of piano and pressure that surges toward something primal and tragic. It’s less music than dread set to rhythm.

28 Days Later didn’t invent fast zombies. But it made them matter. It made them terrifying again. It stripped horror down to its bones and asked, “What are you willing to become when the world ends?”

As 28 Years Later looms on the horizon, it’s worth remembering what the first film taught us: the end isn’t walking slow.

It’s coming fast.

‘California King’ A Sleeper


California King starts with promise, then drifts into noise.

Travis Bennett plays Perry, a mattress salesman with a dumb idea. He fakes a kidnapping to impress a girl. That’s the whole movie.

Bennett, best known from Odd Future and Dave, isn’t bad. But he’s not enough. He plays it small, maybe too small. There’s no spark behind his eyes.

Jimmy Tatro plays his partner, Wyatt. Tatro’s a YouTube guy turned comic actor. He gives the movie its only real pulse. He knows how to land a line. He knows how to move.

The script is sharp at first. The lines crackle. The tone feels fresh. The music works. It hums under scenes, gives them rhythm. The first act moves fast and weird.

Then Joel McHale shows up.

He plays Zane, a crime boss. He’s supposed to be the villain. But he isn’t. He’s a void. He looks lost. The smirk from Community is still there, but it’s useless here. He’s not funny. He’s not scary. He’s not anything.

The movie falls apart around him. There’s no tension. No stakes. No story left to care about.

Victoria Justice plays the love interest. She’s fine. The script gives her nothing. She reacts. She disappears.

The plot spirals. It forgets what it was about. Scenes stretch too long. Jokes stop landing. The fake crime becomes a fake movie.

Even the look of the film loses steam. The color, the pace, the energy—all fade by the halfway point. What felt indie-cool turns lazy.

There are moments. A few lines hit. A few scenes breathe. But they’re buried. The movie doesn’t know what it wants to be. A crime comedy? A buddy film? A sketch?

It tries to be Community with kidnapping. But without the wit. Without the structure. It tries to be weird. It ends up dull.

California King sells chaos, but never closes the deal.

Why Hollywood Left L.A.


Hollywood left L.A. years ago. We just didn’t notice until the lights went out.

The signs were all there: empty lots at Paramount, crews flying to Georgia, and shows set in Los Angeles but shot in Toronto. What used to be a boomtown for cameras and cables is now a ghost light waiting for a curtain call.

It wasn’t one single blow—it was a death by a thousand tax credits.

Georgia’s peach logo became more familiar than the Hollywood sign. New Mexico, Louisiana, the U.K., Canada—everyone learned our lines, stole our grips, and offered 30–40% off. We countered with bureaucratic paperwork and a smile. California created a tax incentive too little, too late. We told ourselves: the magic lives here. But turns out, magic follows money.

In 2016, over 60% of network dramas were shot in L.A. Now? Barely 25%. And many of those pretend they’re here while filming an hour outside Budapest. It’s no longer a creative exodus—it’s logistics. If you want to shoot a film in L.A., you’d better write it in Albuquerque.

The ripple effect? It’s a wave. Grip trucks sold off. Catering companies closing. Prop houses downsizing. Once, it took six months and two favors to find a stage in the 30-mile zone. Now, they’re empty, echoing. Union hours are drying up. One estimate says 18,000 industry jobs gone in just the last few years. That’s not a statistic. That’s an obituary.

Everyone points to the pandemic and the strikes of 2023 as the pivot point. But this train left the station earlier. Those were just the last passengers boarding.

The myth that Hollywood means Los Angeles is a vanity we haven’t earned in a decade. We still roll out the red carpet, but we forgot the cameras aren’t even here anymore. Even Ben Affleck—who’s made movies about Boston in L.A.—had to admit, “It’s cheaper to film in Ireland. California took the industry for granted.”

Now, we beg. The governor talks about bigger incentives, more infrastructure, expanding credits. Good. But we’re in a street fight with cities that already won. It’s not just about money. It’s about trust. Reliability. And L.A. hasn’t been that for a while.

Want to know how far we’ve fallen? They filmed Oppenheimer—a movie about a California scientist—across New Mexico and New Jersey. That’s like shooting Rocky in Miami.

The crews are still here. The sun still shines. The talent still wants to come. But the industry doesn’t care where the sign is. It cares where the savings are.

Hollywood isn’t a place anymore. It’s a brand. And Los Angeles, once its flagship store, has become just another outlet mall.

There’s always time for restructuring, for change. But that window closes quickly.

By the time California finishes fixing the script, the tax credits may have already rolled.