Category Archives: Reviews

’Locked’ Starts Strong — Then Stalls

Screenshot

Locked is the kind of movie that starts like a thriller and ends like a voicemail.

http://hometownheroesrun.com/lib/anxiolyticcarbolines-from-molecular-biology-to-the-clinic The premise is killer: A car becomes a prison. Bill Skarsgård plays Eddie, a thief who steals a high-end SUV only to find himself locked inside—physically, psychologically, and morally—by the remote voice of the car’s owner, William (Anthony Hopkins). The car talks. It shocks. It records. It punishes. And you’re in it with him.

For about 20 minutes, it works. Beautifully.

The cabin is claustrophobic. The sound design is vicious. Hopkins’ voice—smooth, icy, deliberate—slithers through the sound system like HAL 9000’s bitter uncle. Skarsgård sells every second of panic. Every gasp, every flinch, every gut-punch realization that he’s not stealing a car—he’s on trial inside one.

But then the movie keeps going.

And going.

What should have been a lean 25-minute short stretches into a padded 95-minute feature. The tension that once hummed starts to wheeze. The film flashes back. It tries to build lore. It monologues. It moralizes. It forgets that the setup was the story.

Hopkins is overqualified and overused. Skarsgård, despite being soaked in sweat and desperation for most of the runtime, can’t save the script from circling.

The movie isn’t bad—it’s just bloated. Stylish, sure. But without drive. A haunted house with cruise control.

There are moments when it hints at something bigger: a meditation on justice, on digital control, on grief. But each thread is abandoned as quickly as it’s introduced. It ends not with a bang, but a “wait, that’s it?”

Locked is a strong short trapped in the body of a feature film. Ironically, it does exactly what its title suggests: it locks itself in—and can’t get out.

If You Change Your Mind


ABBA is back. Or more accurately, ABBA never left.

More than four decades after the Swedish pop juggernaut disbanded in 1982, the disco darlings are conquering Spotify—and TikTok—with the same glittery gusto that once captivated roller rinks and teenage bedrooms.

This week, “Gimme! Gimme! Gimme! (A Man After Midnight)” crossed one billion streams on Spotify, joining “Dancing Queen” in the platform’s Billions Club. But here’s the plot twist: half of those ears belong to Gen Z, the generation born between the late 90s to early rens.

How do you explain that? What is it about ABBA that has Gen Z swooning like it’s 1979?

For a generation raised on hyper-processed pop and algorithmic playlists, ABBA’s catalog offers something radical: sincerity. The music may sparkle with disco flair, but the emotions underneath—yearning, heartbreak, euphoria—are raw and real.

There’s no irony in “The Winner Takes It All,” just devastation dressed in satin. And Gen Z, for all their online wit and digital fluency, crave that kind of vulnerability.

But there’s more to this intergenerational love affair.

First, there’s the sound. ABBA’s arrangements are lush, their hooks undeniable. In a music space of minimalist bedroom pop and trap beats, the maximalist sheen of ABBA feels refreshing.

Songs like “Lay All Your Love on Me” and “Super Trouper” overflow with harmonies, strings, and synths. Even “Gimme! Gimme! Gimme!,” a plea for companionship, gallops forward like a dopamine train.

Second, there’s the aesthetic. Gen Z didn’t invent vintage, but they perfected it. From fashion to fonts to filters, they’re remixing the past with 21st-century savvy.

ABBA’s sequins, flared pants, and glam stage presence fit perfectly into the digital nostalgia carousel. On TikTok, “Gimme!” has become the soundtrack for choreographed dances, makeup transitions, and tongue-in-cheek thirst traps. It’s disco as meme, and ABBA—knowingly or not—gets the punchline.

Third, there’s the story. Gen Z loves a saga, and ABBA has one. The romantic entanglements, the dramatic breakups, the against-all-odds reunion—all of it is rich with emotional lore.

Add in the theatricality of Mamma Mia! (both the musical and film franchise), and you’ve got a full-fledged mythology.

Spotify confirms that in 2025, Gen Z accounts for a whopping 50% of all ABBA streams. That’s over 11 million young listeners discovering the group for the first time—half of all new ABBA fans. And they’re not just playing the hits. Tracks like “Chiquitita” and “Money, Money, Money” are climbing Gen Z’s most-streamed list, suggesting the deep cuts resonate, too.

There’s a beautiful irony in it all. ABBA, long dismissed by critics as bubblegum fluff, now stand as emotional sages to a generation searching for meaning in the mess.

Their music is kitschy and deep, ridiculous and profound—sorta like life. When the world feels as unstable as a disco ball on a ceiling fan, maybe ABBA offers something stable: four voices in harmony, singing their guts out.

The winner DOES takes it all after all.

The Death of Late Night TV


When CBS announced The Late Show with Stephen Colbert would end in May 2026, it arguably signed the obituary for traditional late‑night television.

And it’s hard to ignore the man behind it. Trump hailed the firing, calling the comedian a hack.

But Colbert wasn’t canceled for lack of talent or relevance—his show led the hour in total viewers and dominated the 18–49 demo for nine straight seasons. Instead, the move was a calculated surrender, a capitulation to an autocrat and a broadcasting model that has collapsed under its own weight.

A once‑invincible format is now gasping:

  • Ad revenue for network late‑night programs dropped from $439 million in 2018 to $220 million in 2024  .
  • Prime‑time ad sales eroded significantly—CBS itself claimed Colbert’s show lost $40–50 million annually, with a $20 million salary and a 200‑person crew to support  .
  • Viewership fell too: from 3.1 million to 1.9 million, with ad revenues in the 11 p.m. slot dropping from $121M in 2018 to $70M in 2024  .

Even top‑performing shows like Colbert’s are no longer economically viable in the linear broadcast model.

Broadcast is bleeding viewers to streaming and social media:

  • Streaming overtook cable and broadcast in June 2024, now capturing 44.8% of all TV usage versus broadcast’s 20% and cable’s 24%  .
  • Nielsen reports show over 40% of total TV time is now dedicated to streaming platforms  .
  • Pew Research: 83% of U.S. adults use streaming services, while only 36% maintain cable/satellite subscriptions  .
  • Exploding Topics notes streaming holds a 36% share of total TV usage, with global subscriptions rising from 1.1 billion in 2020 to 1.8 billion in 2025  .
  • YouTube, now delivering over 1 billion hours of TV content daily, surpasses traditional broadcast in living-room viewing  .

The audience has migrated, and so have the revenue streams—PPC ads, sponsorships, even direct subscriptions are redefining the media economy.

Late-night hosts once served as cultural arbiters. Now they’re optional extras:

Even top talent like Conan O’Brien shifted to online-first models via Team Coco, acknowledging where audiences now live.

Colbert’s cancellation wasn’t solely financial—its timing was telling. It came days after Colbert accused CBS/Paramount of a “$16 million bribe” to Trump for his $16 million settlement with 60 Minutes. Some allege the criticism hastened his demise—particularly as CBS pursues an $8.4 billion merger requiring FCC approval under a Trump-appointed chair.

Senator Elizabeth Warren and others called for scrutiny, warning that Colbert lost his job “because he dared criticize the president.” 

Stephen Colbert was the best of late-night: edgy, topical, and successful. Yet even he couldn’t survive the death rattle of network television, nor the political cost of dissenting voice. His sacking signals more than the cancellation of a show—it marks the death knell for an entire format.

In the streaming age, audiences don’t wait for late-night—they stream what they want, when the mood strikes. And if networks won’t pay—and won’t stand by their voices—then those formats become irrelevant.

Colbert lost not because he failed—it’s because in 2025, that game is over.

And because he dared criticize the president, his exit feels like more than a ratings casualty—it’s a dark foreshadowing of the shrinking space for political satire on mainstream TV.