Category Archives: Reviews

Tarantino’s Reservoir Dog: Legacy

Quentin Tarantino, the last great American film director, surprised Hollywood last night when he backed out of his 10th and supposedly last movie, The Critic.

No reason was given for the departure from the movie, which had already cast Brad Pitt in the titular role of a second-string film critic who wrote for a porno mag (based on a real critic Tarantino read in the 70’s). Critic was to mark his final feature as he eased into his sixties.

It’s a great idea for a flick — especially for Tarantino, who was always a little jealous he didn’t make Paul Thomas Anderson’s Boogie Nights. It’s set in the greatest era of humanity, the 1970s, in the greatest biz in humanity, show, and includes porn. Check, check and check.

Only problem is that The Critic was always meant to be his penultimate film, not the grand exit that became Once Upon A Time…In Hollywood. And the hard truth is that whatever he chooses as his cinematic farewell, it faces a steep headwind to overshadow Hollywood. Maybe impossible.

Critic stood to be Tarantino’s most personal film, and that may have led to the director “simply changing his mind,” according to Deadline, which broke the piece.

Personal movies give us a glimpse into the life of the filmmaker. Think American Graffiti and George Lucas; Almost Famous and Cameron Crowe; Dazed and Confused and Richard Linklater. We got to go to cinematic high school with these guys. But none work as swan songs. Just the opposite: The glimpse left us wanting to know more.

By contrast, it feels like Quentin never left high school: All of his movies brim with loud and proud geek proclamations — namely his love of all things Hollywood, from TV to kung fu to blaxploitation.

It’s made Tarantino a legend among millennials, a historian among audiences younger than 50, and a headline among film writers when he says anything of note about his forebears like Coppola, Scorsese and De Palma. Tarantino’s personal film was True Romance (or at least how he’d like to be seen), and he was the writer, not director.

Tarantino told Deadline he’s not interested in re-writing the movie, even though Sony already sank a reported $20 million in pre-production. Perhaps he saw how anti-climactic a small-scale story could compare to his re-writing of the Manson murders and birth of Hollywood’s most daring era.

Tarantino didn’t help himself by announcing (and echoing ad nauseam) that he would leave the industry after his 10th film. He said he didn’t want to become one of those directors who worked well past their prime and now made schlock for a paycheck.

Fair enough, but time will flatten a man. And I’m sure, when Hollywood was hitting the publicity circuit back during its release 2019, another movie, another circuit, another day in the slog, seemed far off.

Now it’s here. Now it’s pushed back.

I think myopia killed The Critic. Tarantino once told me he writes his screenplays longhand, so he can fully immerse in the story. Perhaps he was so immersed in writing Hollywood that he didn’t see what an epic farewell ride he had crafted. How do you craft the perfect “bye” when the “good” was great?

This is not at all a call to finish the 10th movie and be done with it. I want Quentin to go Kubrick on our asses and direct till he drops. And if anyone knows how to make an impression in a theater, it’s Tarantino. His swan song may be as sublime as his debut.

But this “final film” trade buzz was never the stuff of a good Tarantino story. Give us some blood, guts and sexuality not suitable for all audiences, and we’ll happily sit stuck in the middle with you.


x

‘Zone of Interest’: The Return of Horror Radio


Between the pandemic, studio greed and America’s love of franchise, Hollywood has become a bit of a bedazzled cadaver: bloated, leaky, beginning to rot as summer heat approaches. But the makeup is perfect.

But Covid brought new life to other forms of sequestered living. Television is in a new golden era. Streaming created a new Hollywood power broker, the influencer. And everyone and their drunk half-cousin started a podcast.

America’s audio revival could not have come sooner. True Crime is as popular a genre in the U.S. as, well, true crime as an activity. And none come truer — or more horrific — than The Zone of Interest, a rare movie that is more powerful audibly than visually. It’s radio theater with virtual reality effects. This is a movie to be experienced twice: once with captions; once without.

Directed by Jonathan Glazer (Sexy Beast); Zone examines the real-life commandant of Auschwitz, Rudolf Höss, and his wife Hedwig, who strive to build a dream life for their family in a house and garden next to the camp.

In a sublime decision, Zone doesn’t show a single death. Instead, it pulls a reverse Schindler’s List, the Oscar-winning masterpiece that was shot entirely in black and white, save for one Jewish girl in a red dress.

Here, we get muted colors, and the Jewish girl in a dress is cast in negative-contrast light as she rushes to feed her Polish village by sneaking food under the cloak of night.

More moving, though, is the sound that undergirds Zone. As Hedwig explains the garden to her mother-in-law, we hear the anguished cries of women and children being herded to the gas chambers (more than 1.1 million died in Auschwitz) just beyond the garden wall. As Joseph goes bird hunting on the grounds, we hear the crack of executional gunfire. The steady grind of the crematoriums is a nauseating white noise.

Some critics, particularly young ones, have dismissed the film as a foley stunt in an overdone genre. Conservative douche Ben Shapiro raked it for not showing a single Jewish death.

Apparently, Ben didn’t get the point of the story. Zone takes an intentionally clinical look at the task of murdering millions, from the paperwork to transportation to counting cash and gold-filled teeth. That the words then find purchase now is downright chilling.

It makes for a terrifying cacophony.

The Best Movie of 2023

Wait.

I want my vote back.

Not that I had one — with the Oscars, at least. But I did have one with the Critics Choice Awards, and like dozens of other critics, blindly and blissfully joined the vortex that was Barbenheimer down the awards rabbit hole.

I see now that I was mistaken. And the best movie of last year was a Christopher Nolan ripoff to boot.

Meet Dream Scenario, an under-the-radar horror-comedy (hormedy?) that went virtually unnoticed last winter as Oppenheimer won every award under the irradiated sun.

The American feature film debut of Kristoffer Borgli of Norway, Scenario is visually stunning, narratively taut at 102 minutes, and smart as hell, dropping references to everything from Carl Jung to David Byrne to neuro-biologist Robert Sapolsky. This is the movie Franz Kafka and Jung would have made together.

Yet even with its grade point average, Scenario is easier to follow than its lofty inspiration, Inception. As in that Nolan thriller, dreams in Scenario are but a landscape, as navigable as a shopping mall with a locator map.

Of course, none of this works without Nic Cage, who turns in his best performance since Adaptation. He again plays a balding, paunchy, insecure hero, which is this actor’s awkward wheelhouse. When he affects his passive aggressive whine, Cage may be America’s most convincing antihero.

Even when he’s dreaming. Especially when he’s dreaming.

Cage plays Paul Matthews, a forgettable academic who suddenly appears in the dreams of strangers. He becomes a viral sensation, particularly when that sensation turns dark.

The movie is a reflection of pop culture’s capricious (and fleeting) taste, cancel culture and social media’s hypocritical obsession with genuineness — as seen through the jagged sensibility of, say, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.

Ultimately, though, Dream Scenario tackles life’s largest questions: What is worth dreaming about? What is worth a dream’s fruition? Can you tell the difference between fantasy and reality?

Scenario may not hold all the answers, but isn’t afraid of any questions. Hollywood once dreamt of such things.