Tag Archives: twitter

One Character or Less

Image result for trump lynching

We at the HB hope you enjoy President Trump’s latest tweet, which has dominated the airwaves and frustrated staffers and spokesmen at Little Kremlin, er, the White House, since president Trump sausage-pecked it yesterday. It hopefully will be the last you see.

We plan to no longer quote his non-newsworthy tweets — i.e., nearly all of them — for the sake of our own sanity and the nation’s. From here going forward, we’re employing the LTC Policy regarding Twitter, as well as all Social Media.

LTP is an acronym for Limited Twitter Coverage. The policy calls for any tweet that is tantamount to an ad hominem attack on a person, group or cause to be stricken from news coverage. We invite our colleagues  to do the same — not only to improve political discourse in America, but to re-institute a standard of values in U.S. journalism, which unfortunately has become a mirror of the people it covers.

You can use the latest tweet as reason enough for an LTC Policy, though we could have (and should have) implemented such a policy years ago. Precisely, three years ago. Remember covfefe? (“Despite the constant negative press covfefe.”) That was the tip of a cognitively dissonant iceberg. Here are just a couple of his Alzheimer-ish ramblings, in addition to the latest:

Yes, romantic loyalty is important, Mr. President.

Er…what? And who or what the hell is EASY D?

And so on. Books have been published about his “tweetstorms.” Image result for book about trump tweetsA count by The Washington Post and New York Times found that the president has tweeted 17,000 times from 2015, when he entered the race, through July 2017. We must have passed 25,000 tweets months ago. Imagine the ink we’ve spent, the airtime hours we’ve wasted, just to cover his 3 a.m. rants?

Writing about Trump’s caustic journaling is a Faustian bargain. The devil pays well, but always collects. On the one hand, you could argue that America has a right into the insights of the man with the nuclear PIN code. Anything that exposes his predisposition, they argue, informs a voting public.

The argument’s not without merits. And that’s not to mention the money at stake from covering Trump’s tweets. Boiling blood always outsells coagulating, and CNN, MSNBC and about every other outlet in America would chop off its right hand rather than give up that cash cow.Image result for twitter cash

But at what cost the cow? Does it not play into a simple-but-effective Republican strategy of getting beneath Democrats’ skin? Does it not make news coverage of the very subject numbingly repetitive? What’s worse: Are we discriminating against those who aren’t part of the Social Media ecosystem? They’re a larger group than you think: A full 78% of Americans aren’t on Twitter, according to a Pew poll. Yet 51% of Americans read tweets in the media, according to the same study.

What if we have been reeled in by the troller-in-chief? Consider the distraction the tweet caused: Instead of covering the plethora of scandals before us, we’re going ape shit over the word “lynching” and its meaning. Consider how the tweet was really a coded wink to his base: The administration can (and did) argue that the media was misconstruing him again while still giving a nod to Trumpkins. All while we chased cauldrons.

Speaking of which: For us reporters (it’s time we speak in the collective), tweets don’t it even pass  basic reporting essentials, like attribution and sourcing. News outlets — particularly new and shiny digital ones — love to make a point of how hip and topical they are by quoting clever, anonymous Twitter users. You’ll see legitimate outlets quoting tweeters with identifications like or @centralsquarepigeon,  or @LordVoldemort7, or @sarcasticrover, or on and on and on. Some have clever quips to make, some not so much. Either way, a reporter would be given a pink slip  had he/she returned from a Man-on-the-Street story without real names, real attribution, anything that would give the interviewee reason to stand by his or her words.

To add to the confusion, Trump rarely tweets about anything of import. Other than lambaste investigations as witch hunts, when has he tipped his hand about anything controversial or even revealing? Before the  Post story broke, were any of the 25,000+ tweets about Ukraine’s need to battle corruption? Any tweets about how his “internal tax audit” is going? Anything about his emoluments schemes (besides denying them)?Image result for funny trump tax return

Even yesterday’s tweet could use a LTC Policy vetting. What exactly did the president reveal with that controversial missive? That he’s a racist? That he doesn’t know history? That he has no grasp of the definition of words (Webster’s definition of lynching: “(of a mob) kill (someone), especially by hanging, for an alleged offense with or without a legal trial).” Last time I checked, impeachment is a legal trial, and Trump still breathes.Image result for black man lynched

This isn’t to say we should drop coverage of Twitter. It has become the White House’s de facto source of press releases, as opposed to news conferences. Foreign nations — most recently France and Brazil — have publicly bickered and delayed aid over perceived-offensive tweets. Cabinet hirings and firings are done by tweet (ask John Bolton). The #Metoo movement was an historical hashtag. And stories like the Vanity Fair article on Mitt Romney using the pen name @PierreDelecto helped to chillingly  underscore the fear that runs through the GOP. They are legitimate stories.

But what are we really gaining with circus tent coverage over all administration tweets, besides misinformation? 24/7 news outlets have been quick to trumpet new ethics policies, including withholding the identity of mass shooters and not re-reporting thoroughly debunked conspiracy theories.

But that’s not nearly far enough. If we hope to regain even a modicum of respect in the public’s eye, we’ve got to demonstrate some deliberateness in what we cover — if only to give the stories we do write sense of gravitas. It’s a counter-intuitive ask: to drop some stories simply because they don’t cut muster, even if it hurts our bottom line. But we do it with every other form of journalistic coverage, from entertainment to business to sports.

Why not the most important beat of all?

 

 

Strangling the Moment

 

I had one of the most ordinary experiences of my life this month.

Like so many mundane endeavors, this one involved the government. Specifically, state government: I had to renew my driver’s license.

Previously, this had been a surprisingly headache-free process, particularly in California. I’ve had my share of motorized vehicles, and have become something of a DMV idiot savant. California had nearly perfected the bureaucracy: On some visits, the line moved more quickly than I could fill out the predicate paperwork.

Recently, though, the state “mainstreamed” the process, according to the its Pollyannic press announcement of the change. Appointments and driver’s tests could be made online, presumably to make the already-expedient process blindingly so.

But I soon realized those improvements were aspirational at best. I received the renewal notification in late March. The notice said to give myself at least a month to find an open appointment.

Wow, I thought. So much for expediency.

On, fittingly, April 1, I went online to schedule an appointment, five weeks in advance of expiration. But the earliest availability — in metro Los Angeles — was June 1. So much  for mainstream. So I braced for a morning rise to try my walk-in chances. I knew the line would be long. Be prepared for a three-hour wait, I girded myself. Maybe even four.

It was 6 1/2 hours.

Normally, I would have stormed out of the office by hour five in line. Fuck it, I would have thought. I’ll take the risk of a month on an expired license.

But since my father’s death and my subsequent departure from the Gnash, I’ve learned the importance of navigating stillness. Of holding onto moments, even stopped ones. Especially stopped ones. One of dad’s favorite sayings was that time moves more quickly with age, which is as true as navy blue.

Still, despite time’s seemingly inexhaustible warp drive, you can pause it. Strangle it, even. Leave it like an ant in amber: goin’ nowhere until you free it.

Sorry about that, Father Time. Mother Nature taught me a few wicked bitch slaps. In fact, she  sent me to the hospital a few weeks earlier to condition my patience with a three-hour emergency room wait, followed by a two-hour gurney detainment. Emboldened by the slo-mo adventure,  I decided to surprise Time at the DMV and challenge him to a bore-off.

Perhaps it was being braced for inertia (a necessity in LA traffic). Or a new outlook on time’s passage. Maybe I was high. Whatever the reason, the 6.5 hour wait — which included about .02 minutes of actual paperwork — was somehow tolerable.

In fact, I think I had the strange rush runners describe. The glacial shuffling, the dense throng of hundreds, the pent-up anger and herd-stink of the DMV, it all  somehow left me giddy when I walked out. I broke into hysterical laughter on the drive home. My mother thought I’d buried the lead, starting with news of me passing the eye test instead of the wait.

That’s when I realized: I had, at least fractionally, taken baby steps in strangling time.  Not only that; it’s damn simple to do.

There’s a huge caveat, of course. Some parents literally need the day to run 25 hours. Some people could use an 80-hour week to pay for things like food.

But, for the spoiled lot of the rest of us, we really don’t know how to handle time. Particularly that which is down. Our cell phones, websites, deadlines and Facetwit accounts have rendered spare  time as rare as an albino alligator (a real thing that prowls southeast Louisiana).

I’ve seen the bouts of FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out), the tales of breaking free of the social media cycle, the difficulty of claiming time that is actually your own.

Good news, then. Or, as Whitman might say, “Answer.” Time need not flee you by. You can pause time. Here are five ways to strangle the moment:

Take the 7-second test. It sounds like like no time, but try a couple things that will change your mind about seven seconds.

First, after a normal inhale, hold your breath. Count to seven. Repeat the exercise on the next breath, only stop breathing halfway through the exhale and count off seven seconds again. Finally, do the same one more time, after you have exhaled. That’s it. Find a simpler meditation (suck it, Deepak!).

But admit it. Didn’t the very air you breathe taste a little sweeter on the second inhalation? Even more so on the third?

Here’s a socially braver exercise. When you’re talking to someone, either on the phone or in person, think about what they said for seven seconds. Say nothing. Just absorb what was said and weigh it before speaking. Your banter buddy will initially think something is wrong with you, the silence seemingly so interminable. But after a while, they way you’re perceived will change. You will outwardly transform from awkward to thoughtful. Do it regularly, and you will gain a reputation for being intellectual. All with a seven-second pause.

The point is, even brevity is longer than you think.

Recognize wet cement. Life is full of wet cement moments: That first minute the concrete of your mind is laid and a memory begins to dry into permanence.

We remember the big ones: births, marriages, deaths.

But what about those innumerable wet cement moments? The little recollections that fire randomly through your synapses like a lit match in a fireworks stand. A joke a child told. A revelation a friend confided in you. That weird exchange at the grocery store. Those things that are burned into your consciousness for reasons you can’t explain or understand.

But you can recognize them. Think of a positive deed you’ve done. Perhaps you helped a stranger. Rescued an animal. Gave an unsolicited compliment that left a true impression. Those are wet cement moments; little scattered gestures that make you, when the bill is tallied, what makes you a good person.

If, for instance, you’re doing the driving to take your child and her friends to their first concert, don’t think of it as a parental obligation. That’s a wet cement moment, one that she will never forget. If you see it as wet cement as well, neither will you.

Resist spackling. This one isn’t easy, but try it. When an event on your calendar is canceled, don’t fill it with another errand. You had already accounted for it, when you scheduled that meeting tomorrow so you could get your oil changed or your kid to a school trip today. What if you were to simply enjoy that hour? What if you were to people watch? Daydream? Take the 7-second test. It might not be unforgettable, but most likely it will be more memorable than a substitute chore.

Make mountains of molehills. Don’t hesitate to mentally gloat over those moments of pride — and any self-flattery you know in your heart. Your job as a professional. Your skills as a listener. Your love of animals. Your patience with stupid people. Those are attributes to which we could all aspire — and celebrate when we accomplish them, however mundane.

We’re taught not to make mountains out of molehills, advice that makes sense when you’re thinking of daunting or frightening things. But when it comes to the positive, well, fuck that. Make a big deal of maintaining your composure, or speaking openly, or listening instead of talking. Celebrate your victories of human nature, however small. For who else will recognize them, if not you? What good is a laurel if you don’t rest on it?

Reevaluate boredom. Boredom is terribly underrated. It’s a sign of utter contentment. Hungry people don’t get bored. Seriously sick people don’t get bored. People whose lives are at risk don’t get bored. There was a time when only the only people who enjoyed the fringe benefits of boredom where rich: aristocracy, castle owners, slaveholders.

Consider this statistic: Humans have been on the earth for about 200,000 years. If we consider the industrial revolution (which began in 1760) as the demarcation line between a life of modernity and having to hunt or forage for food, human beings have had the opulence of boredom for less than 1% of our time on the planet. We evolved mightily to create the fidget spinner. No need to piss on the accomplishment.

That’s it. No strenuous exercise, no change in your diet, no elective surgery. When our lifespans are measured in minutes — and everyone will face that truth one day — we won’t be measuring all the things we got done. We’ll be measuring those moments we held still, held close, until they became a part of us. Those moments we strangled.

If the average lifespan is 70 years, you get 2.2 billion seconds, or 314 million opportunities to take the 7-second test.

Better get started. Time’s not wasting, but it’s not waiting, either.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COZzsTwDghQ

 

“Only don’t tell me you’re innocent. Because it insults my intelligence and makes me very angry.”

 

Man, Donald Trump must suck at movie trivia.

He clearly doesn’t remember much of The Godfather II.  The series has provided reams of classic quotes in film lore, including making offers that cannot be refused. In the sequel, Michael Corleone gave one as equally memorable:

“My father taught me many things here. He taught me in this room. He taught me: keep your friends close, but your enemies closer.” (While some scholars attribute an abridged version to the Chinese general Sun Tzu in the sixth century BC, there are no published sources yet found which predate its use in Francis Ford Coppola’s 1974 script).

Somehow, this is what Trump heard:

“My father teached me a lot, like to make close enemies of your friends.”

How else to explain his latest case of Tweetarrhea, a particularly severe bout of the intellectual runs? Over the weekend, he managed to pound yet another nail in the coffin of his relationship with law enforcement — and insult the intelligence of the kids of Parkland.

In one tweet.

This is it:

“Very sad that the FBI missed all of the many signals sent out by the Florida school shooter,” the pumpkin-in-chief wrote. “This is not acceptable. They are spending too much time trying to prove Russian collusion with the Trump campaign – there is no collusion. Get back to the basics and me us all proud!”

You gotta hand it to the guy: He may be the most concise insulter in the history of American politics.

But how does he pick his targets (outside of race and gender)? The only thing more mysterious than his tweets (and grammar) are his cross-hairs, which currently have a bead on Robert Mueller and shot kids.

Both tacks are, at best, bewildering. Mueller made a brilliant counter-punch on Friday with his indictment of 13 Russians for election meddling — and publicly stating that  no Americans were implicated in this set of indictments. Trump took the bait, conceding the meddling but maintaining his distance from it.

This is Mueller is keeping you closer, chump.

The second target is even more mystifying. You’re trying to convince internet-savvy teens that blame lies at the feet of cops? Kids may do stupid things, but that doesn’t make them stupid. Even Wayne LaPierre, the head of the NRA, had to be shaking his head at Trump’s rationalization. Particularly when he heard the words of Cameron Kasky, a Parkland student who lived through the massacre — and is helping organize a March for Our Lives protest calling for gun control.

“This isn’t about the GOP,” he told reporters Sunday. “This isn’t about the Democrats. This is about us creating a badge of shame for any politicians who are accepting money from the NRA and using us as collateral.”

Wow.

Careful picking on the intelligent, Donnie. They have the best words.

Oh, and a helpful reminder of The Godfather: Michael Corleone punched a cop and had to move to Italy to avoid prosecution.

Hey…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vZx7yF_a7M