Category Archives: The Contrarian

How Susan Collins Froze the Women’s Movement

Image result for susan collins with trump

So that’s why a woman can’t be elected president. Maine Sen. Susan Collins.

You know Suzie. She’s one of the dimwit GOP Senators who agreed to a trial without witnesses or evidence obtained in the second half of said trial. She also, as expected, voted to acquit Trump.

All of that would be understandable — or at least explainable — had Collins simply followed the example set by her lemming colleagues. But, she couldn’t help but try to tactically dodge a political hot potato that ended up hitting her square in the face — and the face of all women seeking equal footing in the workplace and beyond.

When asked during an interview with MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell whether she thought Trump would feel free to run amok with Senate protection, Collins said this:Image result for susan collins lawrence o'donnell

“I believe that the President has learned from this case” and that Trump “will be much more cautious in the future.”

This is an astounding statement, one that suggests political naivete, constitutional softness and, most damaging, an unfitness for the job — a reputation no non-white male can afford to shoulder, particularly in the heat of a presidential race.

How do you possibly say that, after three years, on live TV and still maintain a straight face? Name a single lesson (other than that bankruptcy isn’t a presidential deal breaker) that President Napalm has learned in that time. To be presidential? Nope. To treat the leaders of of other nations with a modicum of diplomacy? Nuh-uh. To pronounce “origins?” Come on, a president can learn only so many words. You know how long it took him to memorize “quid pro quo,” let along announce it? It’s unfair to ask impossible tasks. “Origins.” As if. (If it didn’t want to be mistaken for a fruit, it shouldn’t have spelled itself so similarly to “oranges,” right Donnie?)Image result for trump origins

For Collins to say Trump will learn his lesson is her claiming the check’s in the mail. And it conveys the very stereotype that Republican women cling to when they say they want a no-bullshit leader: That women are too soft, too forgiving, to malleable to play pro sports with the boys. Hillary Clinton won the popular election by 3 million votes and penised Washington still took it away We know why GOP men resist scrapping the college: It’s their last rung of political power. But I’ve yet to hear a single GOP woman call for reform. Perhaps there have been. But I haven’t heard it, maybe because women don’t reap the headlines we do. Another reason to change stewards.

Bernie Sanders took a lot of shit last week for reportedly telling Elizabeth Warren that a woman could not be elected president of the United States. Whatever you think of that claim, Collins just echoed it — in a much more public and poisonous venue: the halls of the Senate.

Warren’s mediocre performance in the first two Democratic primaries, while not a reliable barometer for the country’s air pressure, suggests the uphill battle any woman faces seeking public office. And that won’t be helped by Collins’ Pollyanna prediction for Trump, because here is what he did the first week of his acquittal:

  • Established an official channel at the Department of Justice to deal with information about Ukraine, as well as Joe and Hunter Biden, being collected by Trump personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani.
  • Announced congressional investigations into the Bidens.
  • Fired Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman (and his twin brother) as well as Gordon Sondland, the former ambassador to the European Union, after Vindman and Sondland testified in the House impeachment investigation.
  • Protested the “harsh” sentencing guidelines for convicted felon Roger Stone, prompting a  Department of Justice’s reconsideration of those guidelines and the resignation of the four federal prosecutors involved in the case.Image result for trump origins
  • Targeted senators — including Utah Republican Sen. Mitt Romney — who didn’t vote with him on impeachment.
  • Held an unofficial “celebration” ceremony at the White House, where he declared victory, held up “Fake News” headlines, praised his friends and supporters and promised a day of reckoning for his “persecutors.”
What do you think, Suzie? Which one of those will teach Donnie a lesson?

 

The Wit(ness)less Path

Image result for iowa caucus"

Evidentialism isn’t much on karma, but it fully embraces the concerto of circumstance. And today’s  was a doozy.

On the same day at the witness-less impeachment of Donald Trump whimpered to its inevitable euthanasia, the Iowa Caucuses kicked off a year of primaries, presidential puffery and, eventually, an actual vote to do something Nov. 3. Oh, and Rush Limbaugh has lung cancer (apparently that 30 years of hot air Rush spewed was carcinogenic). Image result for rush limbaugh"

Now that’s a confluence of events: One party will acquit its leader while another will appoint a new prosecutor. All while the war’s most inaccurate reporter rots from the inside. Say this for the upcoming presidential election: It will be the most honest in modern political history.

Doubt it? Love him or loathe him, does anyone truly feel like they don’t know who Donald Trump is? Are his supporters hard to distinguish? Are there really any on-the-fencers left in America? If so, what the fuck have you been doing for four years? Read something.

The Left, meanwhile, is harder to read; is Bernie a socialist? Will Warren really stick it to the .01%? Could the billionaire sniping between Michael Bloomberg and Trump get any better? (Trump accused Bloomberg of demanding boxes for debates. “The president is lying,” Bloomberg responded in a release. “He is a pathological liar who lies about everything: his fake hair, his obesity, and his spray-on tan.”)Image result for bloomberg trump"

Despite the differences on the Left, they do all share a through-line: All promise to have the spine to bitch-slap Trump. Democratic voters also have a singular though-line: Someone who will bitch-slap Trump.

Which is why Democrats should actually celebrate the vote the Senate took last week to bar any witnesses in the impeachment trial.

Consider, for a moment, the firmament the GOP would have claimed if it had allowed witnesses. Senators could have argued (however speciously) that the trial was a fair proceeding, complete with evidence and witnesses. Neither, however, amounted to enough to warrant removing the president, they would argue. Soak it in enough politispeak, and it may even sound legitimate.

Now, however, Republican Senators have to sell America on the impartiality of a witness-less trial. A much harder stretch, even when playing to dimwits. Like the jurors in the O.J. verdict and the lawmakers who voted to invade Iraq, there are names listed specifically behind these actions. We can decide if there will be a day of reckoning.Image result for oj verdict iraq"

A day after the Senate vote to ban witnesses, a wily hacker, presumably Democrat, massaged the Wikipedia entry on The United States Senate to read this:

The United States Senate was formerly the upper chamber of the United States Congress, which, along with the United States House of Representatives ― the lower chamber ― comprised the legislature of the United States. It died on January 31, 2020, when senators from the Republican Party refused to stand up to a corrupt autocrat calling himself the president of the United States, refusing to hear testimony that said individual blackmailed Ukraine in order to cheat in the 2020 presidential election.

After the hack, Wikipedia quickly took down the entry and restored the original, perhaps one of the first times Wiki has publicly made an entry inaccurate.

But the point was made. For three years, we have lied to ourselves about what would move the political needle: The Muller report? Nope. Ukraine? Next. Political assassinations? You’ll have to do better than that. The only thing that’s going to remove Trump is an overwhelming electoral loss. And even that may be disputed (the guys contested an election he won, for god’s sake).

The results in Iowa will do more than pick a first-round winner. When it and 49 others states have run their preliminary 5ks, they will give us a clearer picture of who we are as Americans. Are half of us flat-Earthers? Anti-vaxers? Half of us believe you’re in a cult. The other half think you’re too hard on the Kool-Aid. We’ll see in less than a year.

If we choose it, impeachment starts now. But make no mistake: We will sleep in beds we made.