Category Archives: Reviews

Don’t Open The Pod Bay Door, HAL — It’s A Mirror


Turns out, Stanley Kubrick isn’t dead. He was just on The Substance.

Coralie Fargeat’s The Substance plays like Kubrick’s ghostly hand is guiding us through Hollywood’s unlit corridors, where beauty becomes a prison and vanity is weapon and wound.

This isn’t just a horror film; it’s a graphic meditation on fame’s slow rot, dressed in Kubrick’s chilling, meticulous style. And it’s the most unsettling film of the year.

Demi Moore’s Elisabeth Sparkle is a once-dazzling star now clinging to relevance, introduced with all the glamor of a Hollywood legend. But when Elisabeth encounters “The Substance”—a drug that promises to turn back time—the story veers into a nightmare drawn straight from Kubrick’s detached, clinical eye. From the carpet to the colors to the cold stare, The Substance is homage to the late director.

But make no mistake: This movie has turn-away gore, which perhaps is the point of a movie impaling the business of turning heads.

Elisabeth takes the drug, and the transformation that follows is not just physical but existential, dragging her into a horror that feels vast, lonely, and unrelenting.

Each step feels like a crossing over, leaving her humanity behind in pursuit of an ideal that’s cold and unforgiving. The effect is almost surreal, as if Elisabeth has become part of some inhuman experiment, a subject to be observed rather than a person with agency.

As Elisabeth’s transformation continues, we’re thrust into hallways carpeted in that unforgettable blood-red pattern from The Shining. It’s a subtle detail, but one that speaks volumes: she’s lost in a maze of her own making, each turn leading her deeper into the horror of her obsession.

When she finally meets Sue—the younger, flawless version of herself, played with haunting restraint by Margaret Qualley—it’s in a setting that could only be Kubrick’s: a bar so still and sterile it feels like The Shining’s Gold Room reimagined.

The conversation between Elisabeth and Sue is unspoken, a Kubrickian standoff where they sit across from each other, the ideal and the broken. Elisabeth’s face, once hopeful, now reflects Kubrick’s cold gaze—a character who sees the cost of her choices and is horrified by them.

And of course, The Substance is more than a commentary on beauty; it’s also about addiction, as Elisabeth’s dependency on her newfound youth deepens.

There’s irony here, as Elisabeth’s fall parallels the same fate as those chasing their own heroin(e), sinking deeper into a habit that promises escape but leaves ruin in its wake. This addiction, however, isn’t about euphoria; it’s about identity, a craving to hold on to something that’s slipping, even as it’s devouring her.

As Elisabeth loses herself entirely, Fargeat’s direction becomes Kubrickian in its cold, analytical gaze. We’re no longer watching Elisabeth; we’re observing her, as if she’s another artifact of Hollywood’s obsession with beauty, dissected under fluorescent lights. Elisabeth’s pursuit of perfection has rendered her as cold and mechanical as a bathroom sink.

The Substance doesn’t offer solace. Fargeat, like Kubrick, is unflinching, her vision of fame and beauty as clinical as it is haunting. Elisabeth’s journey isn’t a tale of redemption or self-discovery; it’s a warning, a brutal reminder that the pursuit of beauty costs not just our youth — but our very selves.

There may be only one self, but what happens when that face isn’t yours?

’Super/Man’ A True Hero’s Story


‘Super/Man: The Christopher Reeve Story’ is not just a documentary about a superhero; it’s a testament to human resilience and love, revealing that the true power lies in hope, not flight.

The documentary, directed by Ian Bonhôte and Peter Ettedgui, takes a nuanced and heartfelt approach to chronicling the life of Christopher Reeve, from his iconic rise as Superman to the near-fatal accident that left him paralyzed.

The film’s focus, however, is not just on Reeve the actor, but on Reeve the man: a loving father, husband, and advocate, who fought for spinal cord injury treatment until his death. The movie is as much a love letter to Reeve’s wife, Dana Reeve, as it is to the man himself, portraying her as a “super-heroic spouse” who stood by his side through unimaginable hardship.

What sets ‘Super/Man’ apart from other biographical documentaries is its balance of Reeve’s professional life with his deeply personal battles. The filmmakers masterfully weave in interviews with his family and close friends, including the late Robin Williams, who was like a brother to Reeve.

The film opens on the harrowing day of Reeve’s 1995 accident, immediately grounding us in the life-changing moment that reshaped not only his career but his entire existence. From there, the documentary alternates between Reeve’s pre-accident rise to stardom and the struggles he faced afterward, a dual narrative that underscores how his greatest role was not as a superhero on screen, but as a real-life fighter for hope and change .

One of the film’s strongest elements is its deep dive into Reeve’s relationships, particularly with his children and Dana. It is the children’s candid reflections on their father—how he was both larger-than-life and intensely human—that lend the film its emotional weight.

Will Reeve, his youngest son, recounts with heart-wrenching honesty the difficulty of growing up with a father who was both a hero and a man in deep physical pain. Through home videos and archival footage, we see Reeve’s struggle to reconcile his desire to return to a normal life with the physical limitations he faced.

At its core, ‘Super/Man’ is about love, not loss. It doesn’t shy from the darkness Reeve faced but focuses on how he and Dana transformed that pain into activism. The documentary reminds us that while Reeve is remembered for flying across the screen in a cape, his true legacy is the work he did from his wheelchair—advocating for those with disabilities, showing the world that paralysis could not diminish his spirit .

With its intimate interviews, stunning archival footage, and powerful storytelling, ‘Super/Man’ succeeds not just as a biographical piece, but as a universal story of resilience. As the credits roll, viewers are left not only mourning the loss of a great man but inspired by his enduring message: The greatest heroes don’t need to fly.

The true strength of this documentary is how it makes you believe, again, that Christopher Reeve could fly—even when grounded.

’Trap’ Feels Like One

M. Night Shyamalan’s Trap is yet another misfire in a career defined by diminishing returns.

What starts as a promising concept—a father caught in an FBI sting at a concert—quickly devolves into an incoherent mess that relies on contrived plot devices and cheap gimmicks to hold the audience’s attention.

Josh Hartnett’s performance as Cooper, a doting father and secret serial killer, is the film’s only redeeming quality. He does his best with a script that gives him almost nothing to work with.

But no matter how much nuance Hartnett brings, it’s impossible to save a character whose survival depends on absurd twists and laughable luck. Shyamalan doesn’t trust his audience or his characters enough to let them breathe, opting instead for increasingly ridiculous scenarios that stretch believability to the breaking point.

The film’s setting, a concert by a pop star with godlike status, is squandered by poor execution. The arena, which should be a claustrophobic nightmare, feels hollow and uninspired.

Worse, the casting of Shyamalan’s daughter, Saleka, as the concert’s megastar, feels like nepotism at its worst. Her performance is wooden and lacks the charisma needed to pull off the role, leaving her scenes flat and cringeworthy .

Shyamalan’s signature twist, expected by now, is delivered so early that it barely qualifies as one. Instead, the film limps along, with each new revelation feeling more absurd than the last. By the time the credits roll, you’re left wondering how such an interesting premise could go so wrong .

Ultimately, Trap is a film that’s trapped by its own mediocrity. Hartnett’s effort is wasted in a movie that is more interested in cheap tricks than delivering on the promise of its intriguing setup.

It’s a disposable thriller that will be forgotten as soon as the lights come up.