data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daf04/daf048b9ed3775c1ae6192c2e2411ad2c3fb86ac" alt=""
The HollywoodBowles podcast looks at Quentin Tarantino’s America.
The HollywoodBowles podcast looks at Quentin Tarantino’s America.
All of Quentin Tarantino’s films have a confessional element to them. Whether it’s the bawdy interpretation of Like a Virgin lyrics in Reservoir Dogs or a thesis on European fast food in Pulp Fiction, it’s clear the director seasons his films to his own idiosyncratic taste.
So it should come as no surprise that Tarantino calls True Romance, the director’s first script and second produced film, his most autobiographical story.
What is surprising, seeing the movie 28 years later, is just how much Tarantino played out his comic book, fanboy fantasies in the Tony Scott film. And how starkly it stands as a remake of the 1973 Terrence Malick crime classic Badlands.
Released on the heels of Reservoir, Romance had one of the finest casts ever featured in a campy action film. Consider this star power: Brad. Pitt, Christopher Walken, Dennis Hopper, Gary Oldman, Val Kilmer, James Gandolfini, Sam Jackson and Michael Rapaport and Tom Sizemore. And they were supporting stars: Christian Slater and Patricia Arquette anchored the movie.
ReSet in Detroit (for perhaps three street scenes), Romance tells the story of Clarence, a lonely pop culture geek who marries a call girl, steals cocaine from her pimp and sells it in Hollywood. Meanwhile, the owners of the cocaine, the Mob, track them down to reclaim it.
The plot is so entwined with what would become Tarantino’s signature flourishes — operatic violence, rock-infused soundtrack, Mexican standoffs — that it’s easy to miss that the screenplay is an updated retelling, and a harbinger of Tarantino’s emerging filmmaking style.
For the uninitiated, Badlands was the breakout feature film of Martin Sheen and Sissy Spacek. The film’s plot and lead characters were based on Charles Starkweather, 19, and Caril Fugate, 14. In 1958, they embarked on a murder spree that horrified the country, dispatched the National Guard and left seven people dead.
The film made stars out of director and actors, though the it earned much criticism for its near childlike fascination with the slayings (the movie is told through Fugate’s wide eyes). While Malick did not blanche at the violence (one scene illustrated the slow, agonizing lethality of a gunshot wound to the stomach), some critics excoriated the director for making heroes out of the killers.
Released 20 years later, Tarantino’s story seemed a fuck-you to those critics. Here, Clarence is goaded into violence. He may have ordered a pimp to watch his own execution, but unlike Badlands, the film makes no secret about heralding the killer. Hopper, who plays Clarence’s ex-cop father, praises his son for taking out the trash. Detectives on the hunt admit they can’t help but like the kid. And his wife, a hooker with a heart of gold, keeps cooing in his ear: “You’re so cool, you’re so cool, you’re so cool.”
These tropes would derail a lesser film. Here, they are scaffolding for Tarantino’s ascending narrative tone. In the quarter-century to follow Romance, Tarantino created a distinct directorial strategy: Take an iconic moment or period in American history, and give it the movie ending Americans would have preferred. Consider his most revered successes (spoiler alert):
Although Romance (like Natural Born Killers) was not directed by Tarantino, the movie is a fascinating glimpse into the formative years of one of the nation’s most important filmmakers, as well as a fun glossary of Hollywood A-listers, who were glomming onto Tarantino scripts in the 90’s after Reservoir. Pitt, in particular, is memorable in a stoner role nearly completely ad-libbed. The characters are as deep and complex as a Slip-N-Slide, but just as fun.
All great American artists have a vision of the country. Bruce Springsteen has an America. David Simon has an America. Beyonce has an America. Even Borat has an America, though he calls it Yankeetown.
Quentin Tarantino has an America. An angry, blood-soaked, rock n’ roll America. He may be the Ken Burns of fictional filmmaking: In Tarantino’s hands, America turns ugly fast. But it looks great doing it.
Stowaway should have sneaked onto a better movie.
It’s not that Netflix’s latest is a bad film. But given the stars, given the studio, given the zeitgeist of space travel, you can’t help but hear “Hollywood, we have a problem” echoing in the background of this sluggish thriller.
Which is a shame, given the terrific cast and the streaming service’s hot streak (it led all studios with 36 Oscar nominations and nearly doubled its wins with seven statuettes Sunday). And space travel — to Mars, no less — is enjoying a second heyday thanks to NASA’s latest triumph and SpaceX’s high-profile achievements.
Alas, Stowaway succumbs to melodramatic tropes and a plot twist that requires booster rockets to suspend disbelief.
Toni Collette, Anna Kendrick and Daniel Dae Kim (Lost) star as three astronauts bound for a two-year trek to Mars when they discover an unplanned passenger (Shamier Anderson) aboard who jeopardizes the mission and their lives.
The movie’s premise alone is a heavy payload. The film largely glosses over how a technical engineer would get stuck aboard the rocket (did no one share the launch date with him? Would no one have noticed the engineer did not report back to duty?). And while Stowaway focuses on a queasy moral dilemma — there’s oxygen enough for only three passengers — the film never quite seems quite up to answering it.
Collette plays Marina Barnett, the commanding officer of the mission, backed up by medical officer Zoe Levenson (Kendrick) and biologist Kim (Kim). All share in a terrific opening sequence, in which they try to keep their nerves — and stomachs — in check as their ship rattles and moans into the final frontier. It’s as good as many finales of other space films. If only it could muster as much drama at story’s end.
But Stowaway hits a lull after Marina discovers injured technician Michael (Anderson), who drops unconscious from an overhead compartment like a bleeding Tribble in Star Trek. We learn that Michael lives alone with his sister, whom he saved from a fire that killed his parents, and had no intention of space travel.
Thus begins the emotional ordeal of the astronauts. Kim is pragmatic, and argues there is no room for a literal hanger-on. He even offers Michael a suicide injection as a solution. Levenson is the astronaut with a heart of gold, who refuses to take die for an answer. Barnett is caught in between — and downright weepy over the conundrum.
And it’s those tears that help undermine the movie. Recent space travel movies like Gravity, The Martian and Interstellar found their footing on a similar theme: Resolution in the face of death. That determination is missing here, and Stowaway leaves audiences to ask: What do you do with a fourth occupant of a three-person raft?
There’s a solution, of course, but it will take a risky maneuver to get more oxygen to the crippled ship. Two astronauts must scale a towering tether to pierce an oxygen tank and extract air. But here, too, Stowaway isn’t sure what to do with the drama. The astronauts must face deadly drops thanks to the “artificial gravity” of the spaceship. But vertigo is a lot more palpable in natural gravity, in a real-world setting like a mountain or skyscraper. A starry backdrop isn’t as squeamish as director Joe Penna would have us believe.
There are nice touches throughout Stowaway, including some surprising character fates and a chance to hear Collette’s rarely-used native Australian accent. Anderson is a solid newcomer.
But given all the promising ingredients of the film, viewers may find themselves feeling like they rode steerage in Stowaway.