Author Archives: Scott Bowles

The Voting Empowerment Act

5 Ways to Defend Voting Rights this Election - Unitarian Universalist  Service Committee

To: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi

Rāmanagaram From: The HollywoodBowles

Dear Speaker Pelosi,

First, an admission. I freelanced for another. I wrote a column Friday calling for the Quarter-Million Campaign, but sent it to the Lincoln Project instead. They just do commercials better. I stand by my decision.

But as an olive branch, I’d like to offer you something better. It’s called The Voting Empowerment Act, and I think it would serve your party well and, more importantly, the people.

Is voting a right or a privilege? (2 letters)

What’s great about the VEA is that it works regardless of next week’s election. In fact, it may even work more effectively in the case of defeat, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves.

The VEA is simple. It would mandate that every county in America establish a minimum of TWO polling places. You could get downright aspirational in higher goals: a 10% increase in every county; a low-income mandate; county-wide voter initiatives, etc. But a seismic first step, as you know, would be requiring just two polling places per county.

Live Updates: We're Tracking The Vote And Voting Problems | FiveThirtyEight

There are really no need for statistics for the passage of this act, which I think is part of its beauty. All you need do is tell voters: “We all saw the horrific lines our citizens had to endure, just to be heard. In the middle of a pandemic, no less. It’s time we follow the Founders’ spirit of law, not just the letter of it.”

Long lines at Baltimore voting centers as many opt to cast ballots in  person - Baltimore Sun

As I said, the VEA works regardless of election outcome. If Democrats were to take power, what better first step, what better administrative introduction than to put power in the hands of the public? They largely align with your views anyway.

Should you lose, the VEA makes a great sword upon which to fall. You could propose the bill, whisk it through the House, and allow the GOP to suffocate it in a public execution. Just watch what happens should they choke out the Affordable Healthcare Act.

Don’t do it for the Party. Do it for the Republic.

I know it’s a lot to ask, bringing sanity to D.C, particularly now. And putting power in our hands may be fool’s folly. God knows we actBut hell, die nobly for a cause if you can’t live humbly for one, right Madame Speaker?

The HollywoodBowles

ps: Can you believe Giuliani dropped his drawers for Borat?!?

Deja Viewed: There Will Be Blood

There Will Be Blood | Jerusalem Cinematheque – Israel Film Archive

There Will Be Blood is ostensibly about real-life California oil tycoon Edward L. Doheny, and even includes the now-famous “I drink your milkshake!” quote, attributed to Doheny during Congressional investigations of the industry.

But on Deja-View, it sure seems like Blood director Paul Thomas Anderson is actually paying homage to Stanley Kubrick, particularly 2001: A Space Odyssey.

And if you really want to go Kubrickian, one could argue that Blood itself is a prequel to 2001. After all, 2001 documents the dawn of mankind. There Will Be Blood documents the dawn of American capitalism.

But we’ll get back to that. As for the first few minutes of Blood, it seems inarguable now that Thomas was paying homage to the 1968 movie:

  • Both movies begin in utter darkness to a rising musical score. 2001‘s intro is an extended blackout as Also Spake Zarathustra swells. Blood percolates to Radiohead’s Jonny Greenwood’s original score.
  • Both first scenes are of desert mountains.
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is 0AAEC980-F3B5-4D7C-B8F5-4C064DC773AF-1024x901.jpeg
  • Both have a “Moon Watcher” scene, as the huddled characters gaze into uncertain skies.
  • Both have pivotal scenes of clubbing.
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is A8B315D2-3875-4EBC-BB7F-B3FBB7354610.jpeg

And it’s the clubbing scene that suggests the larger, loopier theme (of course, this is 2001, so what is loopy). Throughout Blood, we watch Plainview (played by the inimitable Daniel Day-Lewis) as he graduates from gold to oil as he perfects his weapon of choice.

The film, which uses its characters as avatars of American corruption, also tracks the corrosive effect capitalism has on religion (here embodied by Paul Dano). As both men find themselves growing in wealth and power, they also find themselves inevitably and inextricably at odds.

The frenetic finale even works as a handoff to the beginning of 2001. As Plainview sits over his opponent and offers the apocalyptic final line, “I’m finished!” viewers are left with their own metaphorical riddle: What happens when business and religion are in a war to the death?

Anyone’s guess, but it’s reasonable to expect a great leap forward — or back.

To Make Sexy Time with Moviefilm

Borat 2: Sacha Baron Cohen is back to mess with your head — and heart |  Star Tribune

There is no reason a Borat sequel should work.

It comes 14 years after the surprise original — a lifetime and a half in movie metrics. Borat’s fish-out-of-water schtick should be a one-trick pony, just as SNL films are glorified sketch jokes. And everybody should know Sacha Baron Cohen’s chameleon mug by now; he’s already punked Sarah Palin, Dick Cheney and a raft of unwitting stars, TV reporters and dim bulb politicians. His goose should be cooked by now.

And yet, Borat: Subsequent Moviefilm is a small wonder. While not the seismic discovery of the 2006 original — and what could be? — the follow-up is laugh-out-loud funny, surprisingly touching and still remarkable in its ability to get citizens, particularly elected ones, to act like asses for the camera.

Or, in Rudy Giuliani’s case, like a child molester.

Like the first film, the sublime Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan, the sequel has a knock-knock joke simplicity. Cohen plays a correspondent and unofficial statesman from Kazakhstan, and he uses the ruse to get America to drop its guard and describe itself, assworts and all.

Cohen takes a bead on some of his favorite targets: gun rights advocates, evangelicals, and just about any country bumpkin willing to sign a rights waiver. And there are a lot.

But it’s the politicians who always make the best bait (Palin was skewered on Cohen’s Showtime series, Who Is America?) This time around, Giuliani is in the crosshairs. and Cohen nails him the way Bob Woodward nailed Donald Trump in Rage.

Borat releases new video statement about Giuliani scene

Actually, exactly like that. If you remember, this site criticized Woodward for saving a news story about the president’s COVID subterfuge to help sell his book. Here, the stakes aren’t nearly as high, and Cohen rightly used the scene for the, ahem, climax of the film. But Cohen could have made news with the footage alone — if it’s legit.

The scene begins with Giuliani seated on a couch, answering questions from Borat’s “daughter,” an adult actress playing a 15-year-old. When the actress asks the former mayor if they can continue their discussion in the bedroom. he agrees, and is then shown sitting on a bed, as she appears to take his microphone off and he appears to pat her. The segment then cuts to the image of Rudy, reclining on the bed, placing his hands down his pants. Borat then bursts into the scene, screaming “She’s 15-years-old! She’s too old for you!”

Giuliani has vociferously denied any wrongdoing, and accuses the filmmakers of doctoring the scene, which may be true. This is, after all, a feature film.

But Cohen strikes a documentary-like chord every time he turns on a camera, and Moviefilm is gloriously no exception. Perhaps the film’s biggest surprise is its tenderness. Namely, Jeanise Jones, an African-American babysitter who is stunned and offended when Borat instructs Jones to feed his daughter water from a dog bowl if she’s been a good girl. Jones ultimately gives the daughter a sincere, near-tearjerker about the girl standing up for — and finding pride in — her unpolished self.

borat-babysitter-1603552123189.png

There’s nothing new or earthshaking to Moviefilm. It is, after all, a direct-to-Amazon sequel, and you probably got it free with your order of bulk paper towels.

But given the year, the disappointment of $250 million movies like Tenet, and our junk food overload on crap like Tiger King, Borat couldn’t be more timely or welcome. He addresses everything from COVID to religion to gender roles in an hour and a half that seem to time warp by.

Very niiiice.