Monthly Archives: February 2025

Severance Season 2: A Worthy Wait

Time kills momentum.

Television, more than any medium, suffers when stretched too thin, when seasons arrive years apart and audiences move on. Severance had every reason to stumble into that trap.

Instead, its second season does what few long-awaited returns manage: it justifies the wait.

Dan Erickson and Ben Stiller pick up where they left off, not trying to recapture the shock of Severance’s first season but deepening the unnerving world they built.

Gone is the sheer novelty of the original’s unnerving conceit—workers literally severed from their outside lives, trapped in a corporate labyrinth where every move is a mystery.

We know the rules now, but that doesn’t mean we’re comfortable. If anything, the show doubles down, letting the walls close in tighter, the questions pile up higher, and the stakes grow more disturbing.

From the start, Severance establishes that it won’t be taking the easy route. No immediate answers, no hurried reunions, no forced exposition.

Instead, the season leans into its eerie rhythms—long silences, measured stares, sterile halls that feel colder than ever.

The direction, still helmed in part by Stiller, moves with a precision that borders on hypnotic. You feel trapped inside Lumon, even if you’re watching from your couch.

Adam Scott’s Mark remains the quiet center of the storm, his restrained performance anchoring a cast that continues to deliver career-defining work. Britt Lower, Zach Cherry, and John Turturro find new layers to Helly, Dylan, and Irving, each unraveling in their own ways as the corporate nightmare around them tightens its grip.

Patricia Arquette, ever the scene-stealer, shifts between menace and something even scarier—an employee who believes, truly, in Lumon’s vision.

But it’s the sheer audacity of Severance that makes it feel vital. In an era where prestige TV often retreats into formula, this show remains weird, precise, and staggeringly confident.

Scenes unfold like fever dreams—unsettling but calculated, absurd yet deeply intentional. The humor, bone-dry and perfectly timed, breaks the tension just enough before plunging you back into the abyss.

Some moments make you laugh, some make you shudder, and some make you think, Are we sure Stanley Kubrick is dead? Because this is pretty brilliant.

If there’s a complaint to be made, it’s that Severance can’t quite surprise in the same way its first season did. The mystery isn’t new, and the slow-burn storytelling demands patience. But that’s the trade-off: instead of spectacle, you get depth. Instead of easy shocks, you get a creeping, existential dread that lingers long after the credits roll.

Few shows justify their years-long waits. Severance does.

It may not have the immediate gut-punch of its debut, but what it does have is something rarer: a second season that doesn’t just extend a story but enriches it.

And in today’s television landscape, that feels like its own kind of miracle. In or outside the real world.

Mickey’s (And Our) Addiction Problem


I settled into my couch last night, flipping to ESPN for what I thought would be my usual fix of slam dunks and touchdown celebrations.

Instead, I found myself in a parallel universe.

The broadcaster wasn’t analyzing the beauty of a last-second three-pointer or celebrating the skill of the player who made it. No—he was breathlessly explaining how that final shot had pushed the game ‘over’ the betting total, turning thousands of betting slips from losers to winners in the blink of an eye.

I couldn’t believe my ears. This wasn’t sports analysis—it was a gambling infomercial masquerading as highlights.

ESPN, the network that taught a generation to love sports through iconic shows like SportsCenter, was now teaching us how to bet on them. The transformation was jarring, like tuning in to Sesame Street and finding Cookie Monster promoting day trading.

The most unsettling part? Disney, the epitome of family entertainment, is now fully invested in the gambling business.

The house that Mickey built has morphed into the house that always wins, with ESPN’s recent $2 billion deal with Penn Entertainment marking their official entry into the sports betting industry. A company that once worried about showing a princess’s bare shoulder is now comfortable pushing parlays to parents and children alike.

The numbers behind this transformation are staggering. Americans legally wagered over $220 billion on sports between 2018 and 2023, generating nearly $20 billion in revenue for sportsbooks.

That’s just the legal action. The underground betting economy continues to thrive in the shadows, adding untold billions to these figures.

What began with the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision to strike down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act has become a gold rush, with gambling companies staking their claims in every corner of the sports world.

But let’s talk about what we’re really witnessing: the normalization of addiction as American entertainment.

Those “risk-free” bets plastered across your screen? They’re as risk-free as skydiving with a parachute made of promises. These offers are carefully crafted psychological traps, designed to turn casual fans into compulsive bettors.

Even if you lose, they’ll “reimburse” you with site credit—ensuring you’ll come back to chase your losses with house money that isn’t really money at all.

The integration of gambling into sports media goes far beyond mere advertising. Former athletes and respected analysts now pepper their commentary with odds and betting advice as naturally as they once discussed zone defenses.

The line between sports journalism and gambling promotion has become so blurred that young fans might think understanding point spreads is as fundamental to sports as knowing the rules of the game.

The human cost of this shift is already becoming clear. The National Council on Problem Gambling reports a 45% increase in helpline calls since betting’s legalization expanded. College campuses, once hotbeds of bracket pools and friendly wagers, now grapple with students losing their tuition money on smartphone betting apps.

The first step is to treat gambling like smoking or alcohol: You can do it, just not on screen. Like taking a swig or puff, engaging for the camera is verboten.

Other countries offer blueprints for responsible regulation: Italy’s ban on gambling advertising during sporting events, Australia’s restrictions on betting promotions during live games, and the UK’s “whistle-to-whistle” ban on gambling ads during sports broadcasts. These aren’t perfect solutions, but they’re starting points for a necessary conversation.

The integrity of sports itself is at stake. When fans care more about covering the spread than the final score, we all feel the agony of defeat.

Waves

Waves

They came in waves,
with the thunder of bootsteps,
words sharp as metal,
hands heavy as law.


Names unravel like smoke,
lands fold into maps,
lines carve with ink and iron.


The wind asks no permission.

The river seeks no authority.
The sky sees no borders.

They build fences,
not to keep out
but to keep in,
walls that whisper promises
never theirs to give.

And yet, footprints pile upon footprints,
each calling itself the first.